The basic human problem
Clinging usually comes from love mixed with fear.
You love someone.
You fear losing them (through change, distance, death, or rejection).
To protect yourself from that fear, you cling: emotionally, mentally, or behaviorally.
Most philosophies don’t say “love is bad.”
They say: love becomes suffering when it turns into attachment that demands permanence in an impermanent world.
Taoism (going with the flow)
Key idea: Life is a flowing process. Clinging blocks the flow.
How Taoism sees clinging
Taoism compares life to a river. Everything moves, changes, arrives, and leaves.
When you cling to a person:
You are trying to freeze the river
You are resisting the natural movement of life
This resistance creates tension and pain — not because love is wrong, but because control is unnatural.
Simple Taoist wisdom
“If you love something, let it be free.”
Not because you don’t care —
but because forcing permanence destroys harmony.
Beginner example
Imagine holding sand in your hand:
Hold gently → the sand stays
Squeeze tightly → the sand slips away
Taoism teaches soft holding.
Love fully, but lightly.
Let the relationship breathe.
Buddhism (attachment creates suffering)
Key idea: Suffering comes from attachment, not from love itself.
How Buddhism sees clinging
Buddhism makes a clear distinction between:
Love / compassion
Attachment (clinging, grasping, needing)
Attachment says:
“I need you to stay the same”
“I need you to make me happy”
“I can’t be okay without you”
This creates suffering because:
Everything changes
People are not permanent possessions
Depending on something unstable for happiness is painful
Beginner-friendly version
Buddhism says:
“Enjoy the flower without trying to own the flower.”
You can appreciate a sunset without needing it to last forever.
Why should love be different?
What Buddhism doesn’t say
It does not say:
Don’t love
Don’t care
Don’t feel grief
It says:
Love without clinging
Care without possession
Grieve without losing yourself
Stoicism (love without losing inner stability)
Key idea: Love deeply, but don’t give control of your inner peace to something you cannot control.
How Stoics see clinging
Stoics divide life into:
Things you control (your thoughts, actions, values)
Things you don’t (other people, fate, loss, death)
Clinging happens when:
You treat an uncontrollable thing as if it must obey your wishes
That creates anxiety, jealousy, fear, and desperation.
A famous Stoic idea
Epictetus advised:
When you kiss your child or loved one, remind yourself: “This is a mortal being.”
This sounds cold — but it isn’t.
It’s meant to:
Increase appreciation
Reduce shock and devastation when loss comes
Prevent taking people for granted
Beginner example
Stoicism teaches grateful presence without dependency.
“I love you.”
“I’m grateful you’re here.”
“If life changes, I will still stand.”
Hindu / Yogic
Key idea: Clinging comes from confusing love with identity.
In yogic philosophy:
When someone becomes “my happiness,” “my meaning,” “my self”
You bind your identity to something temporary
This creates suffering because the self is treated as fragile.
Yoga teaches:
Love others
Root your sense of self in something deeper and more stable (awareness, soul, inner witness)
Existentialism
Key idea: Love is meaningful because it is temporary.
Existentialists say:
Nothing lasts forever
That’s not a flaw — it’s what gives things value
Clinging tries to escape reality.
But embracing impermanence makes love more alive, not less.
“Because this may end, I choose to love fully now.”
A simple comparison table
| Tradition | Core message about clinging |
|---|---|
| Taoism | Don’t force life; love gently |
| Buddhism | Attachment causes suffering |
| Stoicism | Love without surrendering inner control |
| Yoga | Don’t confuse love with identity |
| Existentialism | Impermanence gives love meaning |
The shared wisdom (in plain language)
All these traditions agree on something profound:
Clinging doesn’t protect love. It suffocates it.
Healthy love looks like:
Presence without possession
Care without control
Commitment without fear-based grasping
You can love someone deeply and still accept:
They will change
You will change
Nothing is guaranteed
And paradoxically:
That acceptance makes love calmer, stronger, and more honest.
Comments
Post a Comment